2016 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke 1.2 DIG-T (115 Hp) 2016Overall Score59.25/100
2016 Nissan Juke vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo Allstar 2016 1.2 TSI 90 HPOverall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan JukeSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
NissanMakeVolkswagen
JukeModelPolo
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan JukeSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
10,8 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
178 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
115 HPPower90 HP
190 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan JukeSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan JukeSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7
—TransmissionDSG
215/55 R17; 225/45 R18Tyre size15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan JukeSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4135 mmLength3972 mm
1765 mmWidth1682 mm
1565 mmHeight1453 mm
1161 KgWeight1139 kg
—Luggage capacity280 lt
2530 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Nissan Juke and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…