DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Nissan GT-R vs 2011 BMW M3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan GT-R

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

91.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan GT-RSpecificationBMW M3
NissanMakeBMW
GT-RModelM3
2011Model year2011
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

Nissan GT-RSpecificationBMW M3
3,5 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
330 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3799 ccEngine displacement3999 cc
486 HPPower420 HP
588 NmTorque400 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan GT-RSpecificationBMW M3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption18,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,6 lt
—Average consumption12,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan GT-RSpecificationBMW M3
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/40 R20; 285/35 R20Tyre size245/40 R18; 265/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan GT-RSpecificationBMW M3
4655 mmLength4615 mm
1895 mmWidth1804 mm
1370 mmHeight1392 mm
1750 KgWeight1810 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2761 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Nissan GT-R and 2011 BMW M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan GT-R leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…