DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Frontier vs 2005 Toyota Camry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Camry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeToyota
FrontierModelCamry
2004Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3275 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
210 HPPower210 HP
313 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption11,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5 ECT-i
265/70 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/55 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5532 mmLength4805 mm
1808 mmWidth1795 mm
1687 mmHeight1470 mm
—Weight1515 Kg
3330 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Frontier and 2005 Toyota Camry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Camry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…