DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Frontier vs 2003 Lexus RX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLexus
FrontierModelRX
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3275 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
180 HPPower201 HP
274 NmTorque283 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption17,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,3 lt
—Average consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/55 R17; 265/65 R17Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5532 mmLength4580 mm
1808 mmWidth1815 mm
1694 mmHeight1660 mm
—Weight1800 Kg
3330 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Frontier and 2003 Lexus RX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…