DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Nissan Frontier vs 2007 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Frontier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
FrontierModelRanger
2007Model year2007
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
154 HPPower143 HP
231 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption—
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/75 R16; 265/65 R17Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5220 mmLength5075 mm
1850 mmWidth1805 mm
1879 mmHeight1745 mm
3200 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Nissan Frontier and 2007 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Frontier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…