DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Nissan Frontier vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Frontier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLand Rover
FrontierModelFreelander
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
154 HPPower177 HP
231 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/75 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/75 R16; 265/65 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5220 mmLength4433 mm
1850 mmWidth1809 mm
1879 mmHeight1709 mm
—Weight1550 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Nissan Frontier and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Frontier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…