DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Frontier vs 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Wagon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMitsubishi
FrontierModelSpace Wagon
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
4Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2389 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
209 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/75 R14; 215/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4981 mmLength4600 mm
1689 mmWidth1775 mm
1590 mmHeight1650 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
2649 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Frontier and 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Wagon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…