DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Nissan Cube vs 2006 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeCitroen
CubeModelC3
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
148 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption5,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14; 185/60 R15; 195/50 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3900 mmLength3860 mm
1670 mmWidth1667 mm
1645 mmHeight1510 mm
1060 KgWeight1127 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Nissan Cube and 2006 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…