DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cube vs 2003 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeCitroen
CubeModelC3
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1386 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
98 HPPower90 HP
128 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length3850 mm
—Width1667 mm
—Height1529 mm
—Weight1072 Kg
—Wheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cube and 2003 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…