2002 • Nissan
Cube
Nissan Cube 1.3 i 16V (85 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.25/100
2002 Nissan Cube vs 2002 Holden Cruze Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Holden
Cruze
Holden Cruze 1.5i 16V (100 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Holden Cruze
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CubeSpecificationHolden Cruze
NissanMakeHolden
CubeModelCruze
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan CubeSpecificationHolden Cruze
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1275 ccEngine displacement1490 cc
85 HPPower100 HP
120 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CubeSpecificationHolden Cruze
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CubeSpecificationHolden Cruze
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
165/70 R13Tyre size—
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CubeSpecificationHolden Cruze
3750 mmLength3625 mm
1610 mmWidth1640 mm
1630 mmHeight1605 mm
835 KgWeight1000 Kg
—Wheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Cube and 2002 Holden Cruze approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…