DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Cima vs 2004 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeGMC
CimaModelYukon
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
4491 ccEngine displacement4807 cc
280 HPPower278 HP
402 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt
12,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16 HTyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4995 mmLength5052 mm
1845 mmWidth2004 mm
1505 mmHeight1948 mm
1850 KgWeight2250 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Cima and 2004 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…