DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Cima vs 2010 Audi Q7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.75–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi Q7
NissanMakeAudi
CimaModelQ7
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi Q7
—0–100 km/h6,4 s
230 km/hTop speed235 km/h
4494 ccEngine displacement4134 cc
280 HPPower340 HP
451 NmTorque760 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi Q7
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
10 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi Q7
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears8 Tiptronic
225/60 R16Tyre size255/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi Q7
4970 mmLength5089 mm
1820 mmWidth1983 mm
1450 mmHeight1737 mm
1770 KgWeight2450 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase3002 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Cima and 2010 Audi Q7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…