DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Cima vs 2011 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.75–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLand Rover
CimaModelRange Rover
2010Model year2011
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
230 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4494 ccEngine displacement4367 cc
280 HPPower313 HP
451 NmTorque700 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank101 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
10 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears8
225/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength4972 mm
1820 mmWidth—
1450 mmHeight1865 mm
1770 KgWeight—
2830 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Cima and 2011 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…