DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan Cima vs 2002 TVR Chimaera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

TVR Chimaera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeTVR
CimaModelChimaera
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h4,4 s
230 km/hTop speed253 km/h
4494 ccEngine displacement4275 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
451 NmTorque398 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption18 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength3965 mm
1820 mmWidth1730 mm
1450 mmHeight1223 mm
1770 KgWeight1060 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2282 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan Cima and 2002 TVR Chimaera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, TVR Chimaera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…