2002 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 4.5 i V8 32V (280 Hp) 2002Overall Score84.75/100
2002 Nissan Cima vs 2002 BMW X5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • BMW
X5
BMW X5 4.4i (286 Hp) 2002Overall Score83.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
84.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
NissanMakeBMW
CimaModelX5
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
—0–100 km/h7,5 s
230 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4494 ccEngine displacement4398 cc
280 HPPower286 HP
451 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank92 lt
—Urban consumption18,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,1 lt
10 ltAverage consumption13,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R18; 255/50 R19; 285/45 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
4970 mmLength4666 mm
1820 mmWidth1872 mm
1450 mmHeight1717 mm
1770 KgWeight2085 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2820 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Cima and 2002 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSCadillac Seville vs Nissan Cima2002 and 2002 model yearsVSBMW X5 vs Nissan Cima2002 and 2002 model years
VSLand Rover Range Rover vs Nissan Cima2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSTVR Chimaera vs Nissan Cima2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSCadillac DE Ville vs Nissan Cima2002 and 2002 model yearsComments are loading…