DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan Cima vs 2002 Jaguar XK 8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

84.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeJaguar
CimaModelXK 8
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,7 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4494 ccEngine displacement3998 cc
280 HPPower284 HP
451 NmTorque375 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
10 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size245/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength4760 mm
1820 mmWidth1829 mm
1450 mmHeight1306 mm
1770 KgWeight1780 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2588 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan Cima and 2002 Jaguar XK 8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…