DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Cima vs 2011 Audi Q5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

84.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi Q5
NissanMakeAudi
CimaModelQ5
2010Model year2011
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi Q5
—0–100 km/h6,9 s
230 km/hTop speed234 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement3197 cc
280 HPPower270 HP
387 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi Q5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption12,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
11 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi Q5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears7 S tronic
225/55 R17Tyre size235/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi Q5
4970 mmLength4629 mm
1820 mmWidth1880 mm
1450 mmHeight1653 mm
1670 KgWeight1805 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2807 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Cima and 2011 Audi Q5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…