DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Cima vs 2012 Audi A7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A7
NissanMakeAudi
CimaModelA7
2010Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A7
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
280 HPPower245 HP
387 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A7
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption7,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
11 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A7
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears7 S tronic
225/55 R17Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A7
4970 mmLength4969 mm
1820 mmWidth1911 mm
1450 mmHeight1420 mm
1670 KgWeight1820 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2914 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Cima and 2012 Audi A7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…