DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Cima vs 2012 Audi A4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A4
NissanMakeAudi
CimaModelA4
2010Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A4
—0–100 km/h6,1 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
280 HPPower245 HP
387 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A4
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
11 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A4
4970 mmLength4701 mm
1820 mmWidth1826 mm
1450 mmHeight1427 mm
1670 KgWeight1640 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2808 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Cima and 2012 Audi A4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…