DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Cima vs 2012 Alpina D5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina D5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAlpina
CimaModelD5
2010Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,1 s
230 km/hTop speed275 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
280 HPPower350 HP
387 NmTorque700 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption7,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
11 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears8
225/55 R17Tyre size255/35 ZR20; 285/30 ZR20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength4905 mm
1820 mmWidth1860 mm
1450 mmHeight1469 mm
1670 KgWeight1865 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2968 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Cima and 2012 Alpina D5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina D5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…