DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Cima vs 2015 Ford Edge Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

84.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
CimaModelEdge
2010Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

230 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2720 cc
280 HPPower316 HP
387 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
11 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength4778 mm
1820 mmWidth1928 mm
1450 mmHeight1742 mm
1670 KgWeight1774 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Cima and 2015 Ford Edge approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…