2007 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2007Overall Score84.75/100
2007 Nissan Cima vs 2007 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.8 i V6 (280 Hp) 2007Overall Score85.5/100
WINNER
Saab 9-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
NissanMakeSaab
CimaModel9-3
2007Model year2007
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
387 NmTorque400 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption16,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
11 ltAverage consumption11,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
4970 mmLength4654 mm
1820 mmWidth1782 mm
1450 mmHeight1507 mm
1670 KgWeight1570 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2007 Nissan Cima and 2007 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…