DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Cima vs 2005 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
CimaModelS60
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,7 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
280 HPPower300 HP
387 NmTorque400 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,3 lt
11 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength4606 mm
1820 mmWidth1804 mm
1450 mmHeight1428 mm
1670 KgWeight1620 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Cima and 2005 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…