DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Cima vs 2004 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

84.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A6
NissanMakeAudi
CimaModelA6
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A6
—0–100 km/h6,9 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement3123 cc
280 HPPower255 HP
387 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
11 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A6
4970 mmLength4916 mm
1820 mmWidth1855 mm
1450 mmHeight1459 mm
1670 KgWeight1540 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2843 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Cima and 2004 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…