DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Nissan Cima vs 1998 Venturi 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

81.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVenturi
CimaModel300
2001Model year1998
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,3 s
230 km/hTop speed280 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2975 cc
280 HPPower282 HP
387 NmTorque420 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption19 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,5 lt
11 ltAverage consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size205/50 ZR17; 255/40 ZR17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength4240 mm
1820 mmWidth1840 mm
1450 mmHeight1180 mm
1670 KgWeight1250 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Nissan Cima and 1998 Venturi 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…