1991 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0i V6 24V Turbo (255 Hp) 1991Overall Score80.75/100
1991 Nissan Cedric vs 1987 BMW M5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • BMW
M5
BMW M5 3.5 (286 Hp) 1987Overall Score79.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
80.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationBMW M5
NissanMakeBMW
CedricModelM5
1991Model year1987
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationBMW M5
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
240 km/hTop speed245 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement3453 cc
255 HPPower286 HP
343 NmTorque340 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationBMW M5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption16,5 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationBMW M5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15 VTyre size195/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationBMW M5
4780 mmLength4620 mm
1745 mmWidth1700 mm
1410 mmHeight1400 mm
1630 KgWeight1430 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1991 Nissan Cedric and 1987 BMW M5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…