2003 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0 i V6 24V (280 Hp) 2003Overall Score81.75/100
2003 Nissan Cedric vs 2003 Audi A6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Audi
A6
Audi A6 2.7 V6 (250 Hp) 2003Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi A6
NissanMakeAudi
CedricModelA6
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi A6
—0–100 km/h6,8 s
220 km/hTop speed248 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement2671 cc
280 HPPower250 HP
387 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
18 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption8,8 lt
—Average consumption11,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi A6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
205/60 R16 HTyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi A6
4860 mmLength4796 mm
1770 mmWidth1810 mm
1450 mmHeight1453 mm
1660 KgWeight1660 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2759 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Nissan Cedric and 2003 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…