DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Nissan Cedric vs 2001 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAudi
CedricModelA6
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,8 s
220 km/hTop speed248 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement2671 cc
280 HPPower250 HP
387 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
18 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption8,8 lt
—Average consumption11,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
205/60 R16 HTyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4796 mm
1770 mmWidth1810 mm
1450 mmHeight1453 mm
1660 KgWeight1660 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2759 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Nissan Cedric and 2001 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…