DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Nissan Cedric vs 1998 Venturi 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Venturi 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

80.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVenturi
CedricModel300
1999Model year1998
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,3 s
220 km/hTop speed280 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement2975 cc
280 HPPower282 HP
387 NmTorque420 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank90 lt
18 ltUrban consumption19 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption9,5 lt
—Average consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/60 R16 HTyre size205/50 ZR17; 255/40 ZR17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4240 mm
1770 mmWidth1840 mm
1450 mmHeight1180 mm
1660 KgWeight1250 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Nissan Cedric and 1998 Venturi 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Venturi 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…