2002 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5T (260 Hp) 2002Overall Score75.75/100
2002 Nissan Cedric vs 1999 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mitsubishi
Galant
Mitsubishi Galant 2.5 i VR-4 Type-V 4WD (280 Hp) 1999Overall Score74.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationMitsubishi Galant
NissanMakeMitsubishi
CedricModelGalant
2002Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationMitsubishi Galant
7,8 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
260 HPPower280 HP
324 NmTorque363 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationMitsubishi Galant
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationMitsubishi Galant
4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationMitsubishi Galant
4860 mmLength4680 mm
1770 mmWidth1740 mm
1465 mmHeight1420 mm
1710 KgWeight1480 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Cedric and 1999 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…