1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5i V6 (190 Hp) 1999Overall Score64.5/100
1999 Nissan Cedric vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 2.5 i V6 24V (190 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 156
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
NissanMakeAlfa Romeo
CedricModel156
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
9,5 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
206 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
190 HPPower190 HP
235 NmTorque222 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
205/65 R15Tyre size205/60R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
—Length4430 mm
—Width1745 mm
150 mmHeight1415 mm
1560 KgWeight1320 Kg
—Wheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Nissan Cedric and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…