DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Nissan Cedric vs 1998 BMW 7 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeBMW
CedricModel7 Serisi
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
206 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
190 HPPower143 HP
235 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption11,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4984 mm
—Width1862 mm
150 mmHeight1435 mm
1560 KgWeight1710 Kg
—Wheelbase2930 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Nissan Cedric and 1998 BMW 7 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…