2004 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5 i V6 24V (210 Hp) 2004Overall Score74.5/100
2004 Nissan Cedric vs 2005 Volvo XC70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 2.5 T (210 Hp) 2005Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo XC70
NissanMakeVolvo
CedricModelXC70
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo XC70
—0–100 km/h8,1 s
200 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
210 HPPower210 HP
265 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo XC70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo XC70
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15 STyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo XC70
4860 mmLength4733 mm
1770 mmWidth1860 mm
1450 mmHeight1562 mm
1600 KgWeight1742 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2763 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Nissan Cedric and 2005 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…