2004 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5 i V6 24V (210 Hp) 2004Overall Score74.5/100
2004 Nissan Cedric vs 2005 Subaru Forester Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.5 i 16V Turbo (211 Hp) 2005Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationSubaru Forester
NissanMakeSubaru
CedricModelForester
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationSubaru Forester
—0–100 km/h6,3 s
200 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
210 HPPower211 HP
265 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationSubaru Forester
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
14 ltUrban consumption15 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationSubaru Forester
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15 STyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationSubaru Forester
4860 mmLength4450 mm
1770 mmWidth1735 mm
1450 mmHeight1585 mm
1600 KgWeight1455 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2525 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Nissan Cedric and 2005 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…