DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Cedric vs 2000 Dodge Avenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

74.5–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeDodge
CedricModelAvenger
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
210 HPPower166 HP
265 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
14 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15 STyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4755 mm
1770 mmWidth1740 mm
1450 mmHeight1346 mm
1600 KgWeight1417 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Cedric and 2000 Dodge Avenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…