1993 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0i V6 (125 Hp) 1993Overall Score53.25/100
1993 Nissan Cedric vs 1993 Audi 80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1993Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Audi 80
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 80
NissanMakeAudi
CedricModel80
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 80
11,5 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
184 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
125 HPPower90 HP
167 NmTorque182 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank66 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 80
4690 mmLength4482 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1406 mm
1360 KgWeight1270 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2612 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Nissan Cedric and 1993 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…