1991 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0i V6 (125 Hp) 1991Overall Score53.25/100
1991 Nissan Cedric vs 1990 Audi 100 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Audi
100
Audi 100 1.8 (90 Hp) 1990Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Audi 100
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 100
NissanMakeAudi
CedricModel100
1991Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 100
10,9 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
185 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
125 HPPower90 HP
167 NmTorque150 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,9 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 100
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 100
4690 mmLength4793 mm
1690 mmWidth1814 mm
1425 mmHeight1421 mm
1330 KgWeight1200 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2687 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1991 Nissan Cedric and 1990 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…