1987 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0i V6 (125 Hp) 1987Overall Score53.25/100
1987 Nissan Cedric vs 1987 Audi 80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.8 (90 Hp) 1987Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Audi 80
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 80
NissanMakeAudi
CedricModel80
1987Model year1987
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 80
10,9 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
125 HPPower90 HP
167 NmTorque150 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank68 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,9 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 80
4690 mmLength4393 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1397 mm
1330 KgWeight1130 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2546 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1987 Nissan Cedric and 1987 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…