2010 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0 (85 Hp) 2010Overall Score49.25/100
2010 Nissan Cedric vs 2010 Lada 2114 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Lada
2114
Lada 2114 1.6 i 8V (81 Hp) 2010Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Lada 2114
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationLada 2114
NissanMakeLada
CedricModel2114
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationLada 2114
18,4 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
157 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
85 HPPower81 HP
170 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationLada 2114
Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank43 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,1 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationLada 2114
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R13
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationLada 2114
4690 mmLength4122 mm
1695 mmWidth1620 mm
1445 mmHeight1415 mm
1480 KgWeight985 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2460 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Nissan Cedric and 2010 Lada 2114 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lada 2114 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…