DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Nissan Cedric vs 2006 Dacia Logan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dacia Logan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeDacia
CedricModelLogan
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats—
4Doors5

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
157 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
85 HPPower87 HP
170 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
12 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4450 mm
1695 mmWidth1740 mm
1445 mmHeight1636 mm
1480 KgWeight1240 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Nissan Cedric and 2006 Dacia Logan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dacia Logan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…