DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Nissan Bluebird vs 1993 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAudi
BluebirdModel80
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2388 ccEngine displacement2309 cc
152 HPPower133 HP
216 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4482 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1405 mmHeight1406 mm
—Weight1270 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Nissan Bluebird and 1993 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…