DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Nissan Bluebird vs 1992 Saab 9000 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeSaab
BluebirdModel9000
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
0 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
211 HPPower195 HP
275 NmTorque323 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption12,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
—Average consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4794 mm
1695 mmWidth1764 mm
1405 mmHeight1420 mm
—Weight1335 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2672 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Nissan Bluebird and 1992 Saab 9000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…