DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Nissan Bluebird vs 1995 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAudi
BluebirdModelA6
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
145 HPPower115 HP
178 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
—Average consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4797 mm
1695 mmWidth1783 mm
1405 mmHeight1430 mm
1230 KgWeight1355 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Nissan Bluebird and 1995 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…