DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Nissan Bluebird vs 1992 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAudi
BluebirdModel100
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
145 HPPower137 HP
178 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4790 mm
1695 mmWidth1777 mm
1405 mmHeight1440 mm
1230 KgWeight1375 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Nissan Bluebird and 1992 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…