1992 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 2.0D (67 Hp) 1992Overall Score51.5/100
1992 Nissan Bluebird vs 1992 Audi 80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 (90 Hp) 1992Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationAudi 80
NissanMakeAudi
BluebirdModel80
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h13,6 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1974 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
67 HPPower90 HP
128 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationAudi 80
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationAudi 80
4585 mmLength4482 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1405 mmHeight1406 mm
—Weight1190 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2612 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Nissan Bluebird and 1992 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…