2002 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 1.8i (115 Hp) 2002Overall Score54.25/100
2002 Nissan Bluebird vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • MG
ZS
MG ZS 1.8 16V (117 Hp) 2002Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationMG ZS
NissanMakeMG
BluebirdModelZS
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationMG ZS
12,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
180 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
115 HPPower117 HP
163 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationMG ZS
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationMG ZS
4470 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1475 mmHeight1390 mm
1270 KgWeight1125 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Bluebird and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…