DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Bluebird vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMitsubishi
BluebirdModelLancer
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
190 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
109 HPPower98 HP
143 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4495 mmLength4485 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1445 mmHeight1480 mm
1110 KgWeight1360 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Bluebird and 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…