DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Bluebird vs 2003 Hyundai Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHyundai
BluebirdModelMatrix
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
186 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
105 HPPower82 HP
135 NmTorque187 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4470 mmLength4025 mm
1695 mmWidth1740 mm
1445 mmHeight1635 mm
1110 KgWeight1370 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Bluebird and 2003 Hyundai Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…