DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Armada vs 2004 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHolden
ArmadaModelCommodore
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
185 km/hTop speed234 km/h
5552 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
309 HPPower340 HP
522 NmTorque470 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank75 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption13 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
15,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
265/70 R18Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength4884 mm
2002 mmWidth1842 mm
1913 mmHeight1450 mm
2480 KgWeight1640 Kg
3130 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Armada and 2004 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…