DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Armada vs 2002 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHolden
ArmadaModelCommodore
2005Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5552 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
305 HPPower306 HP
522 NmTorque460 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank75 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
15,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R18Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength5084 mm
2002 mmWidth1847 mm
1913 mmHeight1545 mm
2340 KgWeight1700 Kg
3130 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Armada and 2002 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…